Re: Climate Remediation Engineering - Size of Problem

On 5/7/25 16:00, john larkin wrote:

On Wed, 7 May 2025 09:41:18 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
 

On 5/7/25 00:56, john larkin wrote:

On Tue, 6 May 2025 23:26:56 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
>

On 5/6/25 22:40, john larkin wrote:

On Tue, 6 May 2025 21:14:35 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
>

On 5/6/25 21:09, john larkin wrote:

On Tue, 6 May 2025 20:38:17 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
>

On 5/6/25 18:47, john larkin wrote:

On Mon, 5 May 2025 20:06:25 -0700, Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid>
wrote:
>

On 5/4/2025 8:48 AM, Joe Gwinn wrote:

For some time, I've been following the debate on Climate Change and
the back and forth on the practicality of removing enough carbon
dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere, soon enough to matter.

>
What constitutes "soon enough to matter"?  To who?  What?
>
It took a long time to dig this hole, why would you think
it would be easy/quick/inexpensive to FILL it?
>
We somehow managed to live with a ban on CFCs (ozone hole).  And,
emission controls on automobiles (smog, acid rain, etc.)
>
One just has to decide there is value in "fixing" these (man-made)
problems.
>
Heed Genesis 2:15, christians!
>

>
There are still a billion dirt-poor people in the world, without
electricity and food insecure. They need energy, transport, and food,
all generating or using CO2.
>
Long-term, prosperous people reduce their birth rates. I expect that
in a few hundred years Earth will have maybe 2 billion healthy,
literate, peaceful people and CO2 will be around 600 PPM, ideal for
trees and crops.
>

>
If only, but I don't believe we'll get there. People are far too
bellicose.
>
Jeroen Belleman

>
We have come an enormous way in the last 1000 years, and in the last
300. I expect continued progress.
>
Races and languages, the basis of tribal warfare, are gradually
merging. Around here every human critter that you can imagine seems to
be friends and lovers and parents with every other. That has to
continue.

>
Religious and political convictions rather seem to diverge increasingly.
The chasm between the richest and poorest grows ever wider.

>
But the fraction of the population that is super-poor keeps declining.
>
Having some rich people around is OK. Having super-poor ones isn't.
>
Most rich people have their wealth in stock shares, just bits on a
drive somewhere. A billionaire doesn't eat a million times as much as
the average person.
>
>

We're far we ever will.

>
Things keep getting better.

>
You sound like Trump.
>
Jeroen Belleman

>
Thanks for the compliment.

>
It wasn't intended as one.

 I knew that. Insults are normal here.
 

The guy is deluded, crazy and dangerous.

 He's smart, has common sense, and is winning.

If his sense passes for common sense in the US, ... never mind.
I suppose you're just rationalizing your poor choice. It's a well
known psychological defense mechanism. Trump is proudly leading
the US into a catastrophe.
Jeroen Belleman