Sujet : Re: Climate Remediation Engineering - Size of Problem
De : liz (at) *nospam* poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 08. May 2025, 13:33:40
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Poppy Records
Message-ID : <1rc0kik.12okhsq1g80ajkN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : MacSOUP/2.4.6
Don Y <
blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:
On 5/7/2025 2:10 AM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
I am surprised that someone with your intelligence and knowledge should
repeat such a fallacy.
Manufacture of vehicle
Manufacture of batteries
Consumables (tyres, battery etc.)
Electricity generations (and the cost of making and maintaining the
plant)
Road making and maintenance (tarmac refining, transport & installation;
road 'wetal'; concrete; street furniture; lighting )
Disposal
But most of those things are present -- in greater quantities -- in
any sort of mechanized transportation.
Bill Sloman's original claim was: "... an e-bike doesn't generate any
CO2.", which is patently untrue. Had he said : " ...an e-bike doesn't
generate any more CO2 than other comparable modes of transport, that
would have been nearer the truth.
-- ~ Liz Tuddenham ~(Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)www.poppyrecords.co.uk