Liste des Groupes | Revenir à se design |
On 11/05/2025 5:04 am, john larkin wrote:
>As solar and wind get to be dominant, micromanagement of power sources>
and loads will be necessary to ensure uptime.
This is largely unnecessary - if the control signal that was being sent
out by the central controller to micromanage each power source was
derived from a function of the frequency, phase, voltage etc., then
rather than trying to distribute the result of this calculation to
millions of devices with low latency, it is better to distribute just
the formula (once every few years or as necessary), and run it on a
microcontroller in the inverters several times every mains cycle. They
already have more than enough processing power.
>
I believe that there are some new regulatuions in at least one Austrlian
state, driven by the (fossil-fuel-stoked) fear of "too much solar
destabilising the grid", which require new home solar inverters to stop
exporting power, unless they receive continuous "permission to export"
signals from our overlords, the network operators. In other words,
rather than exporting power in the case of communications failure, it
goes into the state of "export no power" in case of communications
failure, because otherwise people might unplug their internet to export
more scary solar power if exporting power was allowed when the internet
connection fails. This is a fairly new requirement, so not many
compliant devices are installed now, but once a few gigawatts of these
inverters are running, it will be interesting to see what happens when
there is a major internet outage on a hot summer day, and all of those
gigawatts suddenly go away. Hopefully they thought of that but I doubt it.
>
The rapid control algorithms should be distributed, and the only
low-latency communication signals they should rely upon are frequency
and voltage.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.