Liste des Groupes | Revenir à se design |
Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:Ah. I see.
On 16/05/2025 3:51 am, john larkin wrote:The ambient noise level in an aeroplane is much higher than in a houseOn Thu, 15 May 2025 12:37:24 +0200, "Carlos E.R.">
<robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
>On 2025-05-15 08:18, Bill Sloman wrote:On 15/05/2025 5:14 am, Carlos E.R. wrote:On 2025-05-14 16:16, Glen Walpert wrote:On Tue, 13 May 2025 07:50:36 -0700, Don Y wrote:
>On 5/13/2025 6:26 AM, Glen Walpert wrote:>Another very wild idea was increasing the frequency to around 600Hz. It>
would make transformers and all coiled things smaller. Planes do this.
Possibly would also radiate more. And would not help with control.
But our clocks would run ten times faster.
>
And everything would hum.
This doesn't happen in aircraft.
on a quiet night. (Also, look up Fletcher-Munson curves to see why 600
c/s would be a lot worse than 50 or 60 c/s.)
Alternators for 600 c/s are feasible at a few kW in aircraft but they
are difficult to scale up to power station size.
Another problem with large-scale distribution at 600 c/s would be the
inductive reactance of cross-country power lines and the need for
special alloys and thin laminations to reduce core-losses in
transformers.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.