Re: LTSpice model for a SiC MOSFET

On 20/05/2025 8:14 am, john larkin wrote:

On Mon, 19 May 2025 14:28:39 -0400, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
 

"Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:100fo6f$1nipq$1@dont-email.me...

On 19/05/2025 11:29 pm, john larkin wrote:

On Mon, 19 May 2025 18:19:36 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
>

On 19/05/2025 1:38 pm, john larkin wrote:

On Mon, 19 May 2025 12:23:54 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
>

On 19/05/2025 12:15 am, john larkin wrote:

On Sun, 18 May 2025 18:11:58 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
>

...much snippage

>
You are so smart that you obviously don't need my help.

>
I clearly need help here, but you don't seem to interested in being helpful.

>
Why shoud he Bill? When all he gets from you is "you'd need to be mad to try".

>
Some people have ideas, and like to play with them as a kind of team
sport.
 Some people don't have ideas and want to club them to death at birth.

Some people have enough ideas that they can choose the ones that they play with. This does develop the skill of picking the less good ideas early, and ditching them before you waste too much time on them. I've had enough goods ideas that I've now got three patents to my name.
I've also had a great many more less good ideas.
I've worked with people who are less discriminating about the ideas that they will run with. Even people who have several patents can become remarkably attached to very silly ideas, and rigorous quality control is necessary to keep them from wasting loads of money. C.A.G.LeMay at EMI Central Research comes to mind. I wasn't able to stop him from wasting money, but I did manage to avoid working on his daft project.
John Larkin doesn't seem to have all that many ideas, and he does feel hurt when one of his occasional inspirations turns out to be less inspired than he likes to think.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney