Liste des Groupes | Revenir à se design |
Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:The amount of information you have to spell in your question does depend on the sophistication of the target audience. Spell out too much and you get responses from people who don't know enough to be helpful.
On 21/05/2025 9:05 pm, Liz Tuddenham wrote:Ask a daft (or incompletely-specified) question and you must expect anBill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:>
>On 20/05/2025 7:58 pm, Liz Tuddenham wrote:Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
<snip>
>>That's a lot of words but doesn't describe anything that takes a small>
direct current at high voltage and turns it into larger current at a low
voltage.
The original post didn't say that it was a direct current source.
The fact that it doesn't mention a frequency might have given you a
clue, as should the comment that "The Baxandall class-D oscillator could
do it". A transformer would have been enough for an AC source.
>My comment "Depending on supply frequency and required output current.">
would have given you a clue that I was assuming an A.C. source.
It had to be that or something equally daft.
answer that seems daft to you.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.