Re: Phase or frequency modulation?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Phase or frequency modulation?
De : jl (at) *nospam* glen--canyon.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 07. Jul 2025, 16:11:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <tqon6kpk2e4svvhgr0ph73542ms8vlppm2@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Mon, 07 Jul 2025 08:07:32 -0700, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
wrote:

On Mon, 7 Jul 2025 15:04:46 +0100, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
(Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
>
john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:
>
On Mon, 7 Jul 2025 08:44:41 +0100, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
(Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
 
I have been checking the performance of a variable-reactance type of
frequency modulator which 'pulls' a crystal oscillator.  After
multiplication and mixing, the signal appears at 145 Mc/s.
>
Listening to this signal on an Icom 706 MkII transceiver I found it was
barely intelligible, with severe high frequency cut.  At first I
suspected my modulator but I checked the audio output of the Icom with a
good-quality signal generator and found the response was:
>
200c/s : -3dB
400c/s :  0dB
750c/s : -3dB
1 Kc/s : -6dB
1k5    : -10dB
2k0    : -13dB
2k5    : -16dB
3k0    : -18dB
>
(Using the wideband FM setting of the Icom produced similar results, so
the limitation was in the detector/A.F. stages, not in the I.F. filter)
This looks as though EITHER a 6dB per octave response is being imposed
on the output of the FM detector OR the detector is expecting phase
modulation.
>
The handbook for the Icom refers throughout to frequency modulation and
does not mention phase modulation.  Most references to modulation in the
2-metre band (144-146 Mc/s in the U.K.) mention frequency modulation and
the use of phase modulation would cause 'splash' into adjacent channels
at higher audio frequencies because of the rising characteristic.
>
Has my Icom been designed for a market where phase modulation is the
norm or is there another explantion?
 
Is your "crystal oscillator" a packaged VCXO?
>
No
>
They generally lowpass
the frequency control input, the varactor thing, pretty hard.
>
The circuits are at:
http://www.poppyrecords.co.uk/Radio/G8HEH/2metretransceiver.htm
>
The crystal oscillator is a modified Colpitts with the reactance valve
tapping the signal off the cathode of the oscillator through a 90-degree
phase-shift network consisting of a choke and the cathode resistor of
the reactance valve (which also carries the oscillator cathode current).
>
As the gain of the reactance valve is varied by the audio signal on its
grid, a variable amount of 90-degree phase-shifted signal is fed into
the crystal oscillator frequency trimming inductor in the anode circuit
of the reactance valve.
>
The RC time constant in the grid circuit is 3dB down at 3.4 Kc/s.  I
have tried removing most of the top-cut capacitors between the audio
clipper and the input to the modulator but this made little difference
as all those time constants took effect above 3 Kc/s.
>
 
If your rig is all tubes, probably not. But I suspect the rolloff is
in the transmitter, not the receiver.
>
The initial tests were done with the experimental transmitter but the
audio response figures of the Icom were taken with a Marconi TF 2016A
signal generator.  This has an internal meter which allows the
modulation level to be accurately set and monitored.  The audio source
was a Solartron CO 546 Wein-bridge oscillator which is stable to + or -
0.1 dB.
>
The sig-gen tests confirmed what my ears were already telling me.
>
47K and 1 nF (plus some strays) has a corner frequency of around 3
KHz.

Why not measure the FM and see who the bad guy is?


Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Jul08:44 * Phase or frequency modulation?29Liz Tuddenham
7 Jul14:14 +* Re: Phase or frequency modulation?22john larkin
7 Jul15:04 i`* Re: Phase or frequency modulation?21Liz Tuddenham
7 Jul16:07 i `* Re: Phase or frequency modulation?20john larkin
7 Jul16:11 i  +* Re: Phase or frequency modulation?18john larkin
7 Jul18:28 i  i`* Re: Phase or frequency modulation?17Liz Tuddenham
7 Jul18:48 i  i `* Re: Phase or frequency modulation?16john larkin
7 Jul19:06 i  i  +* Re: Phase or frequency modulation?13Liz Tuddenham
7 Jul22:54 i  i  i+* Re: Phase or frequency modulation?3john larkin
8 Jul08:50 i  i  ii`* Re: Phase or frequency modulation?2Liz Tuddenham
8 Jul16:16 i  i  ii `- Re: Phase or frequency modulation?1john larkin
8 Jul12:19 i  i  i`* Re: Phase or frequency modulation?9Phil Hobbs
8 Jul12:30 i  i  i +- Re: Phase or frequency modulation?1Liz Tuddenham
8 Jul13:45 i  i  i +* Re: Phase or frequency modulation?5piglet
8 Jul15:23 i  i  i i`* Re: Phase or frequency modulation?4Phil Hobbs
8 Jul16:55 i  i  i i +* Re: Phase or frequency modulation?2Liz Tuddenham
8 Jul18:34 i  i  i i i`- Re: Phase or frequency modulation?1Phil Hobbs
8 Jul20:00 i  i  i i `- Re: Phase or frequency modulation?1piglet
8 Jul18:39 i  i  i `* Re: Phase or frequency modulation?2john larkin
8 Jul20:00 i  i  i  `- Re: Phase or frequency modulation?1Phil Hobbs
8 Jul23:20 i  i  `* Re: Phase or frequency modulation?2Ralph Mowery
9 Jul00:45 i  i   `- Re: Phase or frequency modulation?1Phil Hobbs
7 Jul18:28 i  `- Re: Phase or frequency modulation?1Liz Tuddenham
7 Jul14:41 +* Re: Phase or frequency modulation?2Don
7 Jul15:00 i`- Re: Phase or frequency modulation?1Phil Hobbs
7 Jul18:28 +* Re: Phase or frequency modulation?2Liz Tuddenham
9 Jul09:08 i`- Re: Phase or frequency modulation?1Liz Tuddenham
8 Jul22:25 `* Re: Phase or frequency modulation?2Ralph Mowery
9 Jul09:08  `- Re: Phase or frequency modulation?1Liz Tuddenham

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal