Re: The Sciences of the Artificial applied to Biology

On 7/11/2025 11:37 AM, Bill Sloman wrote:

On 11/07/2025 4:04 am, john larkin wrote:

On Wed, 09 Jul 2025 19:38:41 -0400, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
wrote:
>

I forgot to mention that he Sciences of the Artificial digs deep into
why living things (even microscopic ones) have distinct organs and
often components within such organs, versus the organism being a mass
of tissue that somehow does everything.  The driver is efficiency and
simplicity.
>
This assumes that life has already emerged in some unspecified way,
and goes from there.  This is a different approach than Dawkin's
Blind-Watchmaker arguments.
>
Joe
>
>
Ref:  "Simon_Herbert_A_The_Sciences_of_the_Artificial_3rd_ed" - The
Architecture of Complexity.  New copies are available from MIT Press.

>
Even single-cell critters have levels of intelligence. Some people
suggest some level of consciousness.
>
The book sounds cool.
>
Dawkin says he is an atheist above anything else. So he naturally
hides from anything that's not primitive neo-Darwinism.

 Actually, he is a biologist above everything else. Creationists - proponents of "intelligent design" - pretend to have all sort of ides about how living beings are more complicated than Darwinian evolution requires, but it is all nonsense.
 

He's decided "transgenderism" is the New Religion and gone off into JK Rowling la la land.
Maybe him and Morrissey can start a shoegaze band together they seem to have a lot in common