Re: strange cap

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: strange cap
De : legg (at) *nospam* nospam.magma.ca (legg)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 13. Jul 2025, 16:57:41
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <svk77kptvs988i3jqqc8l7tdk9152lcck9@4ax.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
On Wed, 09 Jul 2025 16:01:31 -0700, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
wrote:

https://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/KEMET/CKC33C224KDGLCTU?qs=sGAEpiMZZMvsSlwiRhF8qtsGU%2FCnaNeQZfloC%2Fa%2FQTldKZA3leWJsw%3D%3D
>
$27 each. I think I'll use film.

Difference in ratings between standard and 'low loss' configuration
seems to be even thermal coupling between components and the board -
 resulting in higher current rating for the same temperature rise.

This allows higher loss from the same basic package.

So not really 'low loss'.

There are performance issues for stacked film parts that address
the same issue, for lower temperature limits.

Not something that through-hole packages can easily address.

RL

Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Jul 25 * strange cap6john larkin
10 Jul 25 +* Re: strange cap4Sergey Kubushyn
10 Jul 25 i+- Re: strange cap1Bill Sloman
10 Jul 25 i`* Re: strange cap2john larkin
10 Jul 25 i `- Re: strange cap1Phil Hobbs
13 Jul 25 `- Re: strange cap1legg

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal