Sujet : Re: discharging caps
De : jl (at) *nospam* glen--canyon.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 12. Sep 2026, 20:43:42
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <dbabal59vi2amu0a89g76t6mo3s3ghdj54@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sun, 13 Sep 2026 02:53:12 +1000, Bill Sloman <
bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
On 13/09/2026 2:12 am, john larkin wrote:
On Sun, 13 Sep 2026 01:20:46 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
On 13/09/2026 12:54 am, john larkin wrote:
On Sat, 12 Sep 2026 16:24:19 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
>
On 12/09/2026 7:28 am, john larkin wrote:
On Fri, 11 Sep 2026 17:08:00 +0100, Simon Simple
<nothanks@nottoday.co.uk> wrote:
>
On 10/09/2026 15:20, john larkin wrote:
>
<xxxx>>
2.4 KJ is about 16 firecrackers or five .45 cal bullets worth of bang.
>
If I've done the sums right, that's a capacitor bank bigger than six
beer cans storing about the same energy as one AAA cell!
>
People would notice if that were shorted.
>
Yes, I used to operate capacitor banks of maybe 2-4 times that physical
size charged to 1kV and discharged via a spark gap through a marine
sparker for seismic work. Long time ago before H&S was a thing.
>
I got one of the giant caps. It says that it's 30,000 uF but it
measures 50,000. So we'll have 4000 joules with four in parallel at
200v.
>
I think it's normal for elecs to have more initial capacitance than
the nameplate value.
>
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/apargzu733abcq6ww7w3b/30mF_250v.jpg?rlkey=00osgeyqpxceowgqf7l32mlnr&raw=1
>
One of the more depressing things about electrolytic capacitors is the
need to reform them by keeping the rated voltage across them for a day
or so if they have been unused for a while.
>
The actual electrolyte is a layer of aluminium oxide on the electrode
surface, and that diffuses away slowly if the capacitor is stored
uncharged. In extreme cases you have apply the reforming voltage through
a big resistor because the thinned down layer can no longer stand off
the rated voltage. With the big resistor you can measure the reforming
current as the process proceeds.
>
Obviously the initial capacitance is higher than the rated capacitance.
That may have contributed to your initial 50mF - a +50% tolerance only
get you up to 45mF
>
I reformed a couple of electroltics many years ago when I bought some
military surplus electrolytics for my home built hi-fi. I didn't bother
to monitor the current.
>
I'm thinking that they overdo the capacitance to account for later-on
drying out or some electro-chemical effects, to ensure the guaranteed
minimum c over the (short) specified lifetime.
>
Not that I know of. Note that the tolerance printed on your can was -10%
+50%.
Hey, I saw that. It measured +66%.
>
Which does suggest that it had been left uncharged for long enough to
need reforming.
>
It charged to 100 volts with a power supply that was limited to 20 mA.
The rampup was very linear.
The tolerances are just arbitrary cut-offs on what's probably a Gaussian
distribution. Presumably the manufacturer samples individual capacitors
often enough to be confident that the distribution is stable, but don't
measure every capacitor that they ship. That +66% might just have been
an outlier.
>
The need to reform long unused electrolytic capacitors was well known
everywhere I worked. Nobody ever warned me about any "drying out", and
mythical electro-chemical effects weren't mentioned either. Back when I
was a graduate student in chemistry the electrochemists did get a hard
time, but back then they didn't have good tools for looking at the
microscope detail of the very thin layers where the electrochemistry
took place.
>
Caps are tricky parts.
>
And electrolytic capacitors are even trickier than regular capacitors.
Charge soak isn't nice.
Charged to 100v and discharged for 2 seconds, that big cap went to
about 0.25 volts and then only recharged itself to 2 volts.
Not bad.
>
It's more of a worry in capacitor-based A/D converters. Dual ramp and
quad ramp schemes come to mind. Not all that clearly - that was back in
1979. Going from a Mylar to polycarbonate dielectric got the soak down
far enough to make it tolerable.
I remember dual-slope ADCs. I designed a few. Very long ago. IC adc's
are dirt cheap now and super accurate. 24 bits for $2.
The caps that people can make inside ICs are about the best caps that
are possible.
John Larkin
Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
Lunatic Fringe Electronics
Haut de la page
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.
NewsPortal