On Sun, 13 Sep 2026 02:36:53 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>Of course it will. It depends on converting a solid lump of some nitro-carbon chemical into hot gas, and that's bound to create a supersonic shock wave.
wrote:
On 13/09/2026 2:18 am, john larkin wrote:But the bullet will be much noisier.On Sat, 12 Sep 2026 11:20:56 -0400, "Edward Rawde">
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>"john larkin" <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote in message news:mtpaalh6mup4r05gd8jq83d6ok6laaeg4s@4ax.com...>I sent some emails to people regarding the equipment hazards that I>
mentioned in the "discharging caps" thread. Google refused to deliver
them. I must have used forbidden words like "explode" or something.
There are many reasons why email may not deliver.
Had you emailed these people before?
Often.
>What did the bounce message say?>
mx.google.com gave this error:
This message was blocked because its content presents a potential
security issue. To review our message content and attachment content
guidelines, go to https://support.google.com.....
Google does seem to be using artificial intelligence a lot. Your posts
on the thread mentioned 0.45 calibre bullets as examples of the quantity
of stored energy you were dealing with. It's not one I've ever seen
any other electronic professional use. It might have been enough to
trigger its anxieties.
>
Somebody else suggested that a pitched baseball was in the same
ballpark. A much less threatening example
Your capacitors need add-on goodies to create the supersonic shock wave.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.