Sujet : Re: Solder selection for general repair work
De : pcdhSpamMeSenseless (at) *nospam* electrooptical.net (Phil Hobbs)
Groupes : sci.electronics.repairDate : 18. Nov 2024, 04:18:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <bdcecc79-d308-f624-439a-1a0c5a309bc1@electrooptical.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.0
On 2024-11-17 11:57, bp@
www.zefox.net wrote:
Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
>
You can still get good ol' Kester 44. It has RA flux, the more active
version of the usual tree sap stuff, which is helpful when using old
components.
Is there any electrical or mechanical advantage to be had among the more
modern formulations?
Thanks for writing!
bob prohaska
They all conduct electricity pretty well. ;)
Lead-free is a bit stronger mechanically, but is considerably harder to use by hand--its melting point is higher, and (crucially) Sn63Pb gives lovely shiny joints. Besides being pretty, that lets you know when you've got a good joint--cold joints are dull-looking.
On the other hand, even a good Pbfree joint is dull, so you lose that nice visual feedback.
Ersin Multicore is also good.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
-- Dr Philip C D HobbsPrincipal ConsultantElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOpticsOptics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog ElectronicsBriarcliff Manor NY 10510
http://electrooptical.nethttp://hobbs-eo.com