Sujet : Re: "a Pair of Panties" ?????
De : snipeco.2 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Groupes : sci.lang alt.usage.englishDate : 02. Jul 2024, 01:18:39
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Sn!peCo World Wide Wading Birds
Message-ID : <1qw1nk1.54ugt713sk9k5N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : MacSOUP/2.8.6b1 (ed136d9b90) (Mac OS 10.13.6)
Peter Moylan <
peter@pmoylan.org> wrote:
On 02/07/24 06:47, Sn!pe wrote:
Nitpick: I wrote none of the quoted material below. [grump]
Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>
Le 01/07/2024 à 13:00, Janet a écrit :
In article <v5tgf1$ukmm$1@dont-email.me>, vpaereru-
unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid says...
>
I observe that the kilt is singular - two legs, but only one
hole.
>
Like the skirt, the dress, the petticoat.
>
It's a mystery why men don't wear a petticoat under those itchy
wool kilts.
>
In truth, I don't know what Scotsmen wear under their kilts, and I
shrink from enquiring.
Kilts strike me as particularly unsuited to the Scottish climate. A cold
wind up the kilt would make anyone shrink.
The proverbial wind at the top of Waverley Steps might reveal
all...
I gather that kilts are quite heavy, presumably as a guard against their
blowing up.
-- ^Ï^. Sn!pe, PA, FIBS - Professional Crastinator My pet rock Gordon just is.
"a Pair of Panties" ?????
Re: "a Pair of Panties" ?????