Sujet : Re: "a Pair of Panties" ?????
De : snipeco.2 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Groupes : sci.lang alt.usage.englishDate : 01. Jul 2024, 21:47:46
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Sn!peCo World Wide Wading Birds
Message-ID : <1qw1d8o.1r7d3jr1yb8l8eN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : MacSOUP/2.8.6b1 (ed136d9b90) (Mac OS 10.13.6)
Hibou <
vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
Le 01/07/2024 à 13:00, Janet a écrit :
In article <v5tgf1$ukmm$1@dont-email.me>, vpaereru-
unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid says...
>
I observe that the kilt is singular - two legs, but only one hole.
Like the skirt, the dress, the petticoat.
It's a mystery why men don't wear a petticoat under
those itchy wool kilts.
>
>
In truth, I don't know what Scotsmen wear under their kilts, and I
shrink from enquiring.
The proverbial wind at the top of Waverley Steps might reveal all...
I can reveal all: at the somewhat drunken wedding feast of my kilted
Scottish pal I poked my little camera under his kilt and took a photo,
just for fun. Amusingly, when the flash went off the whole (not hole)
of his kilt lit up like a lampshade.
The resulting photo did show his entirely naked wedding-tackle.
Having only glanced at it briefly (shock, horror) I promptly bestowed
the photo on his new good lady wife, along with the negative.
I swear I shall not do that again.
<https://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/webimg/b25lY21zOmE4NjVkMzU0LWY2OTMtNGVjNy04NWEwLWU5NzFiMWI4NWVjODoxNGMyNmU2ZS00YTNmLTRhNjktOWE2ZS00YWJjYjg1YjQzZmM=.jpg>
-- ^Ï^. Sn!pe, PA, FIBS - Professional Crastinator My pet rock Gordon just is.
"a Pair of Panties" ?????
Re: "a Pair of Panties" ?????