Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s lang |
Subject: Re: "a Pair of Panties" ?????
From: charles <charles@candehope.me.uk>
Newsgroups: sci.lang, alt.usage.english
In article <v5vdu6$19tmo$1@dont-email.me>,
Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> wrote:On 02/07/24 06:47, Sn!pe wrote:Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>Le 01/07/2024 à 13:00, Janet a écrit :In article <v5tgf1$ukmm$1@dont-email.me>, vpaereru->
unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid says...>>
I observe that the kilt is singular - two legs, but only one
hole.
Like the skirt, the dress, the petticoat.
>
It's a mystery why men don't wear a petticoat under those itchy
wool kilts.
In truth, I don't know what Scotsmen wear under their kilts, and I
shrink from enquiring.Kilts strike me as particularly unsuited to the Scottish climate. A cold
wind up the kilt would make anyone shrink.
It's a 20th Century falacy that no underwear is worn under a kilt. It stems
from the War Office, in WW1, gforgetting to put underpants on their uniform
list. Think about hygene.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.