Sujet : Re: /ru:m/ for Rome and the Gods of the Copybook Headings
De : jerry.friedman99 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (jerryfriedman)
Groupes : sci.lang alt.usage.englishDate : 16. Jul 2024, 14:36:57
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <1c52536af91765b59352ce5fab2e0e57@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 7:23:45 +0000, Aidan Kehoe wrote:
>
Ar an cúigiú lá déag de mí Iúil, scríobh jerryfriedman:
>
> [...] I don't follow, since "come" doesn't rhyme with "doom".
Kipling's
> rhyme looks like an ordinary eye rhyme, though I don't know whether
at some
> point "come" rhymed with some pronunciation of "Rome".
>
Well, it certainly doesn’t rhyme with the current pronunciation of
<Rome>, and
it comes much closer to rhyming with <doom>.
Closer in what dialect? Not mine, not that it's relevant to
Kipling. You can hear his pronunciation in a speech at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDcdKA4_KBMI still think the spelling was at least as important as the sound,
and Kipling was much more likely to rhyme "Rome" with "come"
than with "hum", "dumb", etc.
-- Jerry Friedman