Sujet : Re: Somewheres
De : naddy (at) *nospam* mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber)
Groupes : alt.usage.english sci.langDate : 04. Sep 2024, 18:54:04
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <slrnvdh7ls.6rm.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (FreeBSD)
On 2024-09-02, jerryfriedman <
jerry.friedman99@gmail.com> wrote:
More recently, lots of final /r/s have been lost in some dialects
of English, except before a vowel in the next word--
That is a more general change. I took Peter's question to be about
word-final consonants. Also, it's not a straight loss. Take
"weird". That is [wɪəd] in conservative Received Pronunciation.
The r isn't lost, it is vocalized. There is a secondary change
where the resulting diphthong is smoothed, giving [wɪːd], which,
if isn't considered RP yet, will be soon. Equivalent changes are
documented for [ɛə] > [ɛː] and [ɔə] > [ɔː], which raises the question
whether this didn't happen for all vowels, e.g. "hard" [hɑrd] >
?[hɑəd] > [hɑːd]. Compare r vocalization in German and Danish.
a similar pattern to what happened in French,
To me it doesn't look at all similar to the historic partial loss
of French final r, e.g. in the -er infinitives, nor the sometime
deletion of final [r] and [l] after obstruents, e.g. chambre >
chamb', table > tab'.
Strikingly, Middle English lost final -e and, inconsistenly, -en,
which is intimately tied to the collapse of the declension system.
>
And lots of the conjugation system?
Yes, I guess I meant to write "inflection" there. I don't think
the conjugation system shows any additional losses, though. If you
strike -e and -en from Middle English conjugation, you end up with
the system familiar from the King James Version: 2. singular -st,
3. singular present -th, nothing else. The 2SG ending was lost
along with its pronoun. The 3SG change -th > -s is poorly understood,
but didn't add or remove any ending.
-- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de