Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s lang |
Aidan Kehoe wrote:
> Should the state force people to have that implant to save a proportion of
> them from illness and premature death?
The state almost certainly shouldn?t be spending the money to implant this in
everyone, I?d rule it out for that reason. But on pure medical grounds, no,
people have a right to bodily autonomy, it is unethical to make such a thing
mandatory. If a life insurance company were to offer reduced premiums to people
willing to have such a sensor, that would be fine.
The comma after "no" is quite important. I missed it in my first reading
and got confused when I got to the text after the next comma.
My insurance company has given me the option to let them monitor my
driving which I accepted. If I drive carefully, the premium will be
reduced. I score 8 out of ten with my normal driving.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.