Sujet : Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable
De : rjh (at) *nospam* cpax.org.uk (Richard Heathfield)
Groupes : sci.logic comp.theoryDate : 05. May 2025, 17:59:07
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Fix this later
Message-ID : <vvaqor$tvgl$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 05/05/2025 17:10, Mr Flibble wrote:
On Mon, 05 May 2025 16:51:18 +0100, Richard Heathfield wrote:
On 05/05/2025 15:46, Mr Flibble wrote:
On Mon, 05 May 2025 07:04:15 -0400, Richard Damon wrote:
>
<snip>
>
>
This ultimate shows your fundamental misunderstanding of what you are
talking about, especially your inability to handle abstractions, and
things that can create "infinities".
>
You are fucking clueless about mathematics it seems: it is not possible
to create infinites using the mathematics of natural numbers (clue:
division by zero is undefined and infinity is not a number).
>
How many integers are there?
Irrelevent
That's not how you spell 'infinitely many'.
-- Richard HeathfieldEmail: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999Sig line 4 vacant - apply within
Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable
Re: Formal systems that cannot possibly be incomplete except for unknowns and unknowable