Re: How do simulating termination analyzers work? (V2)

On 6/22/2025 6:25 AM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 6/21/25 5:23 PM, olcott wrote:

On 6/21/2025 3:48 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:

On Sat, 21 Jun 2025 10:26:00 -0500, olcott wrote:
>

I want to know exactly how you feed this to ChatGPT.

>
What you want and what you get are two different things.
>
/Flibble

>
When I totally explained the notion of a simulating halt
decider HHH(DDD) ChatGPT understood it so well that it
can and will show the mistake of any possible rebuttal
in the live link posted below.
>
https://chatgpt.com/share/67158ec6-3398-8011-98d1-41198baa29f2
*My explanation had to be airtight and totally self-contained*
>

 Ad you LIED when you said:
 Termination Analyzer HHH simulates its input until
it detects a non-terminating behavior pattern.
 Because the pattern you detect exists in terminating programs, and thus is NOT a non-terminating behavior pattern.
 

I have much more elaborate ChatGPT traces that explain
how you are wrong here. ChatGPT does a much better job
of explaining that than I have.
https://chatgpt.com/c/6857278b-b748-8011-8e3b-d9707acc5971
The above is my original question about HHH(DDD) when
ChatGPT has a 4000 token limit. Back then is got very
confused about my DD proof. Now with a 128,000 token limit
it immediately understood my HHH(DD) proof.
This new one did not agreed that I refuted the HP proof yet
agreed that I did refute the most common self referential
proof technique.

Of course, part of the problem is you don't understand what behavior means, or what is a program.
 Thus, your whole world is based on lies.

--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer