Sujet : Re: postdocs and PhDs hit hard
De : huey.dll (at) *nospam* tampabay.rr.com (David LaRue)
Groupes : sci.miscDate : 02. Mar 2025, 11:15:22
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <XnsB2963577E40DFhueydlltampabayrrcom@135.181.20.170>
References : 1
User-Agent : Xnews/2006.08.24
Retrograde <
fungus@amongus.com.invalid> wrote in
news:67bd3de4$10$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
From the «no funding for science, only for asshattery» department:
Title: Postdocs and PhD students hit hard by Trump’s crackdown on science
Author:
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0000
Link: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-00550-0
Nature, Published online: 24 February 2025; doi:10.1038/d41586-025-00550-0
[1]
As US federal grants remain frozen and budget cuts loom, anxiety and fear
grip
early-career researchers.
Links:
[1]: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-00550-0 (link)
IMHO, those supposed to be hit by the cuts are biased research. Global
Warming is an obvious bias. Those not observing it aren't funded or allowed
to publish like the other do. Any research done by an industry or
manufacturer is typically going to biased to the entity funding the project.
It is only natural, but we should be looking at fair research, not biased
research. Of course, that can be up to the funders and publishers.