Re: What is "uncertain" in quantum physics?

On Tue, 20 May 2025 13:55:51 +0000, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On 20/05/2025 13:22, Bertitaylor wrote:

On Tue, 20 May 2025 9:45:49 +0000, x wrote:

On 5/20/25 00:41, Bertitaylor wrote:

Why do you think the universe expands?

>
I am not sure about that thought experiment concerning
an infinitely old universe having the background of space
gradually filling with stars if there was an infinite
distance or time to look upon it.

>
Idea is that the universe always was and always will be, of infinite
size. This goes against Genesis so idea is automatically outed by
Abrahamic minds to the corruption of science by wrong physics

>
It seems feasible that the integral could add up to
near zero as well as stars everywhere.

>
Near zero density of the universe is not zero density, but enough to put
the show on constant motion.

>
That makes a lot sense, especially more sense than the
circularity of reasoning that I am finding all over the place.
>

Anyway the Doppler effect is different from the photoelectric
effect.

>
Doppler effect shows half the galaxies are going away and half coming
towards us. Redshift, blueshift both happening. No edge found of the
universe. Only more galaxies.

>
Indeed, also the problem of what evidence for what tampering.
If nothing, it's embarrassing...
>
-Julio

Good, Arindam's physics throws out all confusion. It unites all forces
as electric; updates the laws of motion and chucks out the theories of
relativity and quantum.
You can easily get the relevant links from searching in this newsgroup.
--