Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper

On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 14:58:47 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 3:43:44 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>

Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 19:03:20 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
>

On 12/6/24 19:12, Bertietaylor wrote:

Lousy research skills by Einsteinians on display!

>
For some reason, you edited out everything I said, so it is not on
display.  Maybe you don't really want it to be on display, hmm?

>
It is not necessary to repost what has already been posted. Anyone can
follow a thread to see what was written earlier.

>

True that Arindam's 2013 conference paper was rejected by Europeans but
was accepted by the Chinese, Koreans and the Japanese reviewers. In 2016
Arindam did realise the experiment he had described in the 2013 paper.
However the faculty at RMIT stabbed him in the back. They denied that
Arindam had made a working model of a new design rail gun, and failed
Arindam at his final PhD viva. Arindam then continued entirely on his
own and in 2017 posted online a full set of YouTube videos with complete
details. In later years he made more powerful guns and developed the new
theory, got more powerful capacitors to show inertia violation very
clearly. This proving his new physics started back in 1998.

>
I was responding to the claim that rail guns don't recoil.

>
That is not entirely correct. The claim is that the electromagnetic
force accelerating the armature - under certain conditions - does NOT
have an equal and opposite reaction. Now mechanical force is needed to
launch the projectile upon the rails. That force has a reaction of
course. The recoil seen on videos is the reaction from the mechanical
component.

>
There is no mechanical force in a railgun, all the force is
electromagnetic, crackpot.

>
Not so, penisnono Penisnino. If you just put 1000000 amps through a
static bullet it will just weld, melt. You have to give it an initial
velocity through mechanical or chemical or magnetic means, and all those
have the smallish recoil one can see in practical rail guns, including
Arindam's.

>
Nonsense.
>
While there are hybrid railguns that use a plasma arc to fire
non-conducting projectiles, a pure railgun has a conducting projectile
and two or more conducting rails and ALL motion is due to
electromagnetics,
crackpot.
>
It appears you have no clue how a railgun actually works, crackpot.

Silly penisnono Penisnino, Arindam's new design rail gun or reactionless
motor follows far superior theory and practice than the stupid US designs like those using plasma. Because those designs were so lousy,
they were given up.
Note: penisnono = c**t

>
<snip remaining utter nonsense>

Typical penisnono tactic.
Woof-woof woof woof woof woof-woof
Bertietaylor