Re: Acceleration.

Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:

On 4/20/2025 8:25 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
 

>
I highly doubt you have the slightest clue what "relativistic" means or

You're a fanatic, narcisstic idiot mad of hatred,
your  doubts don't matter.
 

average velocity = the change in postion divided by the time

 
With your "inflation" idiocy - no longer.

Meaningless gibberish. Cite an experiment that says otherwise.

 
 

Blazingly obvious to everone.

 
Like  flat, immobile Earth was once.
Not even mentioning V Euclid's axiom.

Meaningless gibberish.

 

Nothing in physics has changed any of that.

 
Oh, yes, "inflation" did. You're a physicist, no
surprise you can't comprehend basic relations
between the words you're using. The words are
not physical and neither relations between them
are. And, well, they're a bit complicated too...
unlike your quantum physics.

Inflation has nothing whatsoever to do with the equivalence principal.

Cite an experiment that says otherwise.

 
 
 
 

>

Further, Einstein's elevator has nothing to do with velocity.
>
Einstein's elevator illustrates the principle of equivalence, showing
that the effects of gravity and acceleration are indistinguishable.

Asserting, not showing. And, as said, you've
never got the simplest consequences of that.

>
Actually experiments that show such to be true

 
Actually they only show it to the faithful
ones. A very basic psychological effect -
of course, too complicated for an idiot
physicist.
You've never understood what  "truth" is.
No one of you. Will you dare denying that?

Babbling gibberish.

The results of experiments are undeniable.

Cite an experiment that shows otherwise.

--
penninojim@yahoo.com