Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper

On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 15:03:57 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

Woof-woof, Arindam allowed me to post the background info. about rail
guns in his 2013 seminal paper on the rail gun.
>
>
>
Arindam Banerjee and Dr. P J Radcliffe
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
Melbourne, Australia
>
>
>
>
Abstract—Recent experimental work on model rail guns shows very little
recoil upon the rails for the static case, where the armature or
projectile does not move.

>
Of course there is no recoil in this case because recoil requires
*MOTION*
as in Newton's laws of *MOTION*, crackpot.

Not so, ridiculous fool. Motion relates to velocity and momentum whereas
recoil is a force measured by mass and acceleration.
Earlier experiments using strain gauges to measure the force on armature
had shown no recoil force on the rails. It was assumed that the recoil
was taken up by the heavy batteries on the ground.
Arindam made the power source off the ground and with the rails as one
unit and verified lack of recoil in his first new design railgun
experiment back in 2015. He made a complete set of videos explaining all
in 2017. Those experiments conclusively proved third law violation. And
first law violation. Out then with the conservation laws of momentum and
energy, inertia and entropy. In with brave new world of reactionless
internal force engines with Arindam's new physics.
Woof-woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor

>
It is clear you don't have a clue what Newton's laws mean, crackpot.
>
<snip remaining babble all based on ignorant nonsense>