Re: Space and spacetime

W dniu 20.06.2024 o 18:01, gharnagel pisze:

Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 20.06.2024 o 15:45, gharnagel pisze:

>
Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
Just more repetitions and lies.  That's all Harrie has.
Posted the proof dosens of times here and will post
it many times more, be sure, trash.
Wozzie is delusional, pretending he has posted "proofs" when

 

OK, trash - an observer going with c/2 through
Solar system is going to measure the length of
a day. What is the prediction of the physics
of your idiot guru for the result? No precision
better than 1% needed.

 A "day"?  What is a "day"? 

A day is a day, Harrie. You're an incredible
idiot, sure, but you've  heard of days, haven't
you?
The observer is in the solar system

and his speed is c/2.  With respect to what?

To solar system, Harrie.

and you can do nothing about it apart of
barking, lying and slandering.

>
Says the repetitious barker, liar and slanderer :-)

Wozzie agrees that he is a barker, liar and slanderer since he

 

No, I don't.

 You didn't reply, so that implies you agree with what I wrote.

No, Harrie, it doesn't. And I don't agree.

I'm sure you can prove LT are correct where they
are correct; evan such an idiot should be able to
manage such a task.

 I doubt if you could :-)

Prove that something is valid when it is valid?

 

Have nothing against Lorentz and his transformations,
anyway.
They demonstrate that t' <> t

 

Nope, they need the interpretation of a relativistic
idiot for that.

 Nope.  They need someone who is adept at algebra.

  Does that

leave you out?
 

which explodes Wozzie's "proof."
So he has just admitted that he lied.

 

No,I didn't.

 Yeah, you did.  You are either demented or you're a liar.

No, I didn't. You are both dementad and a liar.

 

Even such a piece of lying
shit as Harrie is can't lie 100% of time,
but it still can lie most of the time.

 Wozzie lies ALL of the time.  And he just did it again.

Oh, did I? You DO lie 100% of time, Harrie?

Just like he does here by omission:
 

I do and it is.
Only partly.  A whole body of information.

Samely as whole science is.

That's where Wozzie goes off the rails.  He ignores the

most important part.

 So once again Wozzie admits by default that he is off the rails.

Once again Harrie lies.

 

And thus, none of your noble specializations could
mark you as an  invincible expert about it.
You've just self-appointed yourself for that,
as expected from a DK idiot.

>
Pot, kettle black :-)

 

I'm actually an information engineer, poor
trash.

 One who rejects valid information that he is prejudiced against.

One that rejects an obvious lie of a religious
maniac insisting that The Nature itself is
speaking to him and his idiot gurus.

 

That's the specialization of dealing
with information and its various constructs.
No way I'm an invincible expert, of course...
we could discuss, if you weren't such an
arrogant not-even-layman idiot.

 Nice example of his prejudice again :-))

Just some sad truth, Harrie.

He says he has no problem with the LT, so does he
accept that c + v = c?

 

Tell me better, poor trash, whether you accept
that Lorentz has prepared his transformations for
his own  ether theory, not  for The Shit of your
idiot guru?

 Ah, Wozzie won't answer the question, deflecting with an

If LT were designed for an ether theory
the "obvious" c+v=c interpretation of The
Shit's worshippers can't be that obvios,
don't you think, Harrie, poor halfbrain?