Re: Spacetime

Thomas Heger wrote:

>
Am Donnerstag000027, 27.06.2024 um 20:32 schrieb gharnagel:

>
Thomas Heger wrote:

>
My own approach is very different and based on spacetime of GR as
'real'.
>
Now I only needed VERY few assumption!
>
that are mainly: points have features and space is a subset of

something

with higher dimensions.

>
Ah, sounds like M-theory :-))

>
No, I dislike stringtheory and had no extension of that theory in mind.

But M-theory STILL fits that description.  Just because you don't like
it
doesn't mean it's false.

I wanted something different than one of the usual 'materialistic'
concepts, to which string-theory actually belongs.

That's where ALL of physics IS.

I wanted to create matter, space and time out of pure nothing.

That seems to describe a god complex.

There exist actually a book about this idea.

There are books about ANY idea.

Unfortunaterly it is very expensive and VERY difficult to read.
>
(My own 'book'  is for free and much easier to read.)

I read as much as I could stand.

Also: systems are what you call system and have imaginary borders,

which

are infinetely thin.

>
"Infinitely thin" means nonexistent.

>
Sure.
>
That's why I wrote, that spacetime of GR is a smooth continuum.

But the real world is not a smooth continuum.

What we regard as systems, that are actually subparts, which we define
as independent systems, while these borders between them depend on our
definitions.
>
But actually there are no independent entities, because the entities we
call 'particles' are not as independent as we think.
>
TH

Maybe, maybe not.  Have you seen Mindwalk?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mindwalk