Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed

On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 14:22:12 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 1:17:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>

Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 1:36:29 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>

In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

Quite likely the penisnino is a Dark Age Inquisitor type Bible thumper.
Always trying to replace science with sanctioned nonsense.

>
Delusional babble of a multiple personality crackpot and typical thereof
when confronted by facts that challenge the crackpot's delusions, e.g.
that efficiency is generally trivial to measure and that real railguns
have efficiencies of around 50%.

>
Wonder from which thin air that was pulled from.

>
How many references to that would you like as there are hundreds of
them, crackpot.

>
Do they all say 50%, Penisnino?
Not even the stupidest of physicists would be as ridiculous as you,
Penisnino.

>

Arindam's new maths for rail gun efficiency shows the relation between
efficiency with respect to current and gun design.

>
Efficiency is DEFINED as energy out divided by energy in, delusional
crackpot.

>
Which is always 50% according to you, Penisnino.

>
No, crackpot, what I actually said was that real railguns in the real
world currently have achieved an efficiency of about 50%.

No they don't, liar and fool.
Their efficiencies are very very low in terms of missile kinetic energy
and input energies. That way comparable to ancient cannons.
When barrel wear is taken into consideration then the effectiveness as
compared to just efficiency is such that the whole rail gun project with
its existing designs was abandoned.

>
The worst designs have efficiencies of about 1%, which still makes your
claim of a design that is 1,000 times more efficient laughable,
crackpot.

As a reactionless cyclic motor Arindam's design makes efficiency
considerations meaningless for it operates on his superior physics
involving velocity addition.
As a gun efficiency in terms of kinetic energy from  missile velocity
over energy input is certainly more than 1000 times better than the
failed existing US railguns. Their efficiency going by facts told to
Arindam at an international conference was very low, with too much heat
loss due to ohmic loss in the barrel and conductors. Arindam's design
using the heavy armature and much lower voltages cuts down the heat
losses by a 1000 times at least, making it practical for many
engineering applications.

>
<snip remaining insanity>

Penisnino is simply a common stupid racist bigots but being stupid he
does not have the suave hypocrisy of the European alpha apes
Woof-woof
Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)