Sujet : Re: What is "uncertain" in quantum physics?
De : bertietaylor (at) *nospam* myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor)
Groupes : sci.physicsDate : 20. May 2025, 12:22:08
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Rocksolid Light
Message-ID : <c4b1148b4b135af592659061cb310f31@www.novabbs.org>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Tue, 20 May 2025 9:45:49 +0000, x wrote:
On 5/20/25 00:41, Bertitaylor wrote:
Why do you think the universe expands?
>
--
>
I am not sure about that thought experiment concerning
an infinitely old universe having the background of space
gradually filling with stars if there was an infinite
distance or time to look upon it.
Idea is that the universe always was and always will be, of infinite
size. This goes against Genesis so idea is automatically outed by
Abrahamic minds to the corruption of science by wrong physics
>
It seems feasible that the integral could add up to
near zero as well as stars everywhere.
Near zero density of the universe is not zero density, but enough to put
the show on constant motion.
>
Anyway the Doppler effect is different from the photoelectric
effect.
Doppler effect shows half the galaxies are going away and half coming
towards us. Redshift, blueshift both happening. No edge found of the
universe. Only more galaxies.
Photoelectric effect preceded antenna radiation understanding. The
gibberish associated with quantum bunkum keeps pseudophysics frauds
employed and honoured too.
WOOF woof-woof woof woof woof-woof
Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)
--