Re: Approximately 300,000 km/s With Respect To What?

Am Sonntag000021, 21.07.2024 um 13:36 schrieb Maciej Wozniak:

W dniu 21.07.2024 o 12:40, Python pisze:

Le 21/07/2024 à 09:03, Thomas Heger a écrit :

Am Samstag000020, 20.07.2024 um 16:08 schrieb Python:
...

The number of errors in einstein's paper is also extremely large, hence that 'system' would need permanent control over large parts of science.
>
Also a mechanism for sanctions against dissidents would be useful.
>
But for what reasons would any system take such an amount of efforts???
>
Certainly something not very beneficial, because otherwise we would be told about it.

>
Even as fond you are to pathetically stupid "theories" (growing Earth,
Hitler is a British spy, etc.) you seem to realize, somewhat, how
stupid your claims are?
>
There is a far simpler way to explain everything
- There are no significant mistakes in Einstein's article

>
This is actually a counterfactual 'sanction'!
>
You didn't even mention my 'annotated version of SRT' and the 400+ errors I have found in Einstein's paper.
>
Here it is:
>
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RkhX-B5u7X4ga0QH-C53RddjQGctZVdo/view
>
If you think, that I made 400+ errors myself, than please show at least a single one.

>
Come on, Thomas. A lot of yours claims there has been extensively
debunked here, by me and others.
>

  Whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
would be, and he has written it clearly
enough for anyone able to read (even if not
clearly enough for you, poor stinker).

Poincare was a mathematician and a very good one.
He wandered into physics, because he was dealing with the Lorentz transformation and with Maxwells equations.
He came to the conclusion, that Lorentz made some errors (which he was able to correct) and that time should be treated as local time only.
With this assumption he was able to make Maxwells equations form-invariant under relativistic transformations.
Quite impressive actually, but more or less forgotten.
TH