Sujet : Re: Message to Bertie.
De : jimp (at) *nospam* gonzo.specsol.net (Jim Pennino)
Groupes : sci.physicsDate : 14. Nov 2024, 00:23:05
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <nvof0l-4doj.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-125-lowlatency (x86_64))
bertietaylor <
bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 14:44:16 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 3:31:31 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 0:45:29 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>
So Arindam's model new deWsign Railgun gives three times the momentum
than a rifle.
Which is stupendous.
First time one can see and measure the bullet moving up the barrel of a
gun.
>
Your device does not have a barrel, it has a track with a pipe slooowly
rolling down it, crackpot.
A gun barrel is a linear arrangement through which a projectile
accelerates. Usually cylindrical in shape, as is necessary to contain
the gases from a chemical explosion causing projectile acceleration.
The same cylindrical arrangement, out to ape-like propensity for
copying, is present in the existing railguns, making them highly
inefficient.
Arindam's new design has two rails which are the equivalent of a gun
barrel, and which accelerates a heavy bullet horizontally.
All real railguns have two rails, crackpot.
The ones that have the rails enclosed in something that sort of looks
like a gun barrel are there only to maintain directional control of the
high speed projectile and have nothing to do with the accelration of the
projectile, crackpot.
<snip usual idiocy>