physics was interesting 100 years ago (Was: you can suck my cock)

Hi,
I only post in sci.physics because some
peer had the idea that machine learning doesn't
work based on theories of physics, like
entropy, thermodynamics, ... so whats going
on in machine learning from a physical point
of view? Normaly I mainly post in sci.logic.
I have a deep detest of physics, I only passed
my highschool physic because it involved math,
but the physics teacher didn't notice,
he even used me when an inspector came into
the school, to demonstate that he has good
pupils. I played the game although I don't
believe that physics has a lot to offer.
It was interesting 100 years ago.
Bye
P.S.: Physics has a little revival in some
AI related fields like genrative AI. You might
find ideas like wave function collapes,
but its quite different from the models that
try to match nature. AI mostly uses adaptation
and inspiration from physics, not physics itself.
Physfitfreak schrieb:

On 2/4/25 5:14 PM, Mild Shock wrote:

Hi,
>
I already told you you can suck my cock:

  Huh.., ok, so you're a fraud.
 Do not throw papers at us here! I don't believe you understand them.
 My asking you to be more genuine and open about learning those stuff scared you enough to react like ... yes, like a fraud :) You think you can fool me?
 Not only that, almost anything about you is deranged, down to how you form your paragraphs. You're probably a sick poppy. You've probably been here under other aliases, and each time I kicked your sick ass hard.
 Solution for you: Post your blabber to the relativity group only; somebody there might believe that you actually know something. Cause here I'll call your bluff.