Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?

Volney wrote:

Le 31/03/2024 à 13:33, Volney a écrit :

On 3/31/2024 8:23 AM, Richard Hachel wrote:
Since experiment agrees with special relativity, it's obvious that
Richard Hachel is wrong.

 
Your remark is biased.

 
Only toward the facts and what the facts mean.

 
I'll let you think about why.
 

Because I want reality.

and listen up, when an warning of terrorism 𝙞𝙨_𝙩𝙤𝙤_𝙜𝙚𝙣𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙡, that's an
𝙖𝙙𝙢𝙞𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣_𝙤𝙛_𝙜𝙪𝙞𝙡𝙩.

 𝗥𝘂𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗮_𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀_𝗼𝗻_𝘁𝗶𝗽-𝗼𝗳𝗳_𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺_𝗨𝗦_𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁_𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗲_𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗼𝗿_𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸
Moscow was warned about possibility of such an event but data was too
general, Foreign Intelligence chief Sergey Naryshkin said
https://www.%72t.com/russia/595284-us-information-moscow-attack-naryshkin/

Imagine America behind the scenes in bed with these terrorists weaponizing
them against Russia and sitting upon all of the specifics yet sharing
unhelpful general info with Moscow - look at all the shame beaming through
America eyes

Intelligence services of the USA did not share all information with Russia
because the terrorist attack would have failed. And sharing all
informations would mean accepting the responsibility.

This was not a warning 𝙗𝙪𝙩_𝙖_𝙩𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙩_𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢_𝙩𝙝𝙚_𝙐𝙎. Giving any details would have
given Russia the means to prepare for it.

The US warns about themselves. It would’ve been strange for it to contain
the information on what the US had intended to do.

Tipoffs like that are only meant to mislead.

lol so the US and Ukraine are responsible even though they warned them?
This is by far the dumbest logic I've ever seen anyone try to use. Good
job.

The Afghanistan-based offshoot of the Islamic State terrorist group
belongs to US/UK/Mossad