Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s physics 
Sujet : Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)
De : jimp (at) *nospam* gonzo.specsol.net (Jim Pennino)
Groupes : sci.physics
Date : 03. Jul 2024, 04:29:38
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <06telk-jcsn.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-113-lowlatency (x86_64))
bertietaylor wrote:
Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
 
On 2024-07-02 13:52:41 +0000, bertietaylor said:
>
Jim Pennino wrote:
>
bertietaylor wrote:
Jim Pennino wrote:
>
bertietaylor wrote:
Up Newton down Einstein.
>
All off your hero's "theories" violate Newton's Laws genius.
>
They update Newton and dismiss Einstein's silly notions.
>
Newton's Laws has been unchanged for over 300 years genius.
>
High time all accept Arindam's updates.
>
I'd be more inclined to accept Thomas Heger's annotations to Einstein.
 
Your choice to accept Gobbledygook is not surprising.
>
 Science moves.
>
Yes, but crackpots will always be with us.
 
Liars and frauds with little intelligence will abuse when exposed as
liars and frauds. The scope of the e=mcc liars and frauds is stupendous.
It is global. It beats hollow the flat earth wnd crystal sphere wallahs
in its immensity.

Crackpots that write "e=mcc" just show they don't know high school level
mathermatics or physics.



Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Jul 24 * Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)69bertietaylor
1 Jul 24 `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)68Jim Pennino
2 Jul 24  `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)67bertietaylor
2 Jul 24   `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)66Jim Pennino
2 Jul 24    `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)65bertietaylor
2 Jul 24     `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)64Athel Cornish-Bowden
2 Jul 24      `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)63bertietaylor
3 Jul 24       `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)62Jim Pennino
3 Jul 24        `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)61bertietaylor
3 Jul 24         +* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)18bertietaylor
3 Jul 24         i+- Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)1Jim Pennino
3 Jul 24         i`* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)16David Canzi
3 Jul 24         i `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)15Jim Pennino
4 Jul 24         i  +* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)12bertietaylor
4 Jul 24         i  i+* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)10bertietaylor
4 Jul 24         i  ii`* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)9Jim Pennino
4 Jul 24         i  ii `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)8bertietaylor
4 Jul 24         i  ii  `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)7Jim Pennino
5 Jul 24         i  ii   `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)6bertietaylor
5 Jul 24         i  ii    `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)5Jim Pennino
6 Jul 24         i  ii     `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)4bertietaylor
6 Jul 24         i  ii      `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)3Jim Pennino
10 Jul 24         i  ii       `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)2bertietaylor
10 Jul 24         i  ii        `- Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)1Jim Pennino
4 Jul 24         i  i`- Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)1Jim Pennino
12 Jul 24         i  `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)2Volney
12 Jul 24         i   `- Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)1bertietaylor
3 Jul 24         `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)42Jim Pennino
4 Jul 24          `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)41bertietaylor
4 Jul 24           +- Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)1Jim Pennino
9 Jul 24           `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)39David Canzi
9 Jul 24            `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)38Jim Pennino
9 Jul 24             `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)37David Canzi
10 Jul 24              `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)36Jim Pennino
10 Jul 24               +* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)4bertietaylor
10 Jul 24               i`* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)3Jim Pennino
10 Jul 24               i `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)2bertietaylor
10 Jul 24               i  `- Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)1Jim Pennino
10 Jul 24               `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)31David Canzi
10 Jul 24                +- Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)1Jim Pennino
11 Jul 24                `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)29bertietaylor
11 Jul 24                 +* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)11Jim Pennino
11 Jul 24                 i`* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)10bertietaylor
11 Jul 24                 i `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)9Jim Pennino
12 Jul 24                 i  `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)8bertietaylor
12 Jul 24                 i   `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)7Jim Pennino
12 Jul 24                 i    `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)6bertietaylor
12 Jul 24                 i     `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)5Jim Pennino
13 Jul 24                 i      `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)4bertietaylor
13 Jul 24                 i       `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)3Jim Pennino
13 Jul 24                 i        `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)2bertietaylor
13 Jul 24                 i         `- Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)1Jim Pennino
12 Jul 24                 `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)17David Canzi
13 Jul 24                  `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)16bertietaylor
13 Jul 24                   +* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)11Jim Pennino
13 Jul 24                   i`* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)10bertietaylor
13 Jul 24                   i `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)9Jim Pennino
14 Jul 24                   i  `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)8bertietaylor
14 Jul 24                   i   `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)7Jim Pennino
15 Jul 24                   i    `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)6bertietaylor
15 Jul 24                   i     `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)5Jim Pennino
15 Jul 24                   i      `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)4bertietaylor
15 Jul 24                   i       +- Newton's Laws of Motion as revised by Arindam1bertietaylor
15 Jul 24                   i       `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)2Jim Pennino
16 Jul 24                   i        `- Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)1bertietaylor
14 Jul 24                   `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)4David Canzi
15 Jul 24                    `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)3bertietaylor
15 Jul 24                     `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)2David Canzi
16 Jul 24                      `- Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)1bertietaylor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal