Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)

On 7/3/24 20:38, bertietaylor wrote:

The nonsense that is e=mcc cannot be glorified with the exponential
operator and an extra letter.
Arindam's contraction to e=mcc shows his disdain.

Arindam has used this same disdainful gesture on his own
formula that he offers as a superior alternative to E=mcc
| My book "To the Stars" was published in Jan 2000 in my new "adda"
| website.  I presented my new formula e=0.5mVVN(N-k) to explain mass
| and energy relationships on a kinetic and non-destructive basis.
The following header lines are from that article:
| From: Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
| Date: Tue, 02 Apr 24 07:38:40 +0000
| Subject: Re: Getting there at last...
| Message-ID: <AwNHa33OTto93tgHGw_X4ucJZ-Y@jntp>
People who retain articles long enough in their news reading
software and people who know how to use a Message-ID  to get
an article from a news server can verify this.