Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)

On 7/3/2024 4:08 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:

David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:

On 7/3/24 04:44, bertietaylor wrote:

bertietaylor wrote:
>

Jim Pennino wrote:
>

bertietaylor wrote:

Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
>

On 2024-07-02 13:52:41 +0000, bertietaylor said:
>

Jim Pennino wrote:
>

bertietaylor wrote:

Jim Pennino wrote:
>

bertietaylor wrote:

Up Newton down Einstein.

>
All off your hero's "theories" violate Newton's Laws genius.

>
They update Newton and dismiss Einstein's silly notions.

>
Newton's Laws has been unchanged for over 300 years genius.

>
High time all accept Arindam's updates.

>
I'd be more inclined to accept Thomas Heger's annotations to Einstein.

>
Your choice to accept Gobbledygook is not surprising.

>

  Science moves.

>
Yes, but crackpots will always be with us.

>
Liars and frauds with little intelligence will abuse when exposed as
liars and frauds. The scope of the e=mcc liars and frauds is
stupendous.
It is global. It beats hollow the flat earth wnd crystal sphere wallahs
in its immensity.

>
Crackpots that write "e=mcc" just show they don't know high school level
mathermatics or physics.

>
Nonsense needs abbreviation and ridicule.

>
Especially when the likes of Cardinal Penisnino of the Church of
Relativity tries to give Arindam the Galileo treatment.

>
For every Galileo there are 10,000 cranks.
>

 Actually only about 4,000 cranks as cranks seem to average about 2.5
personalities each.
 

How many personalities does Arindam have? At least 3? (Arindam himself and the mutt personalities refer to themselves in the plural) ? Or just two? (Arindam himself but the mutt(s) seem to have just one personality among them) ?