Newton's Laws of Motion as revised by Arindam

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s physics 
Sujet : Newton's Laws of Motion as revised by Arindam
De : bertietaylor (at) *nospam* myyahoo.com (bertietaylor)
Groupes : sci.physics
Date : 15. Jul 2024, 08:27:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <8fbe8566271f37a8b6155a47ab9d5cd3@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 7:13:16 +0000, bertietaylor wrote:

Newton's 3rd law, updated:
To every MECHANICAL action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
>
In Newton's first law delete the qualifier "external"
>
>
These updates done by Arindam in 1998 will take humanity to the stars
after fixing energy and motion issues on Earth for all and for ever.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
3 Jul 24 * Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)62Jim Pennino
3 Jul 24 `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)61bertietaylor
3 Jul 24  +* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)18bertietaylor
3 Jul 24  i+- Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)1Jim Pennino
3 Jul 24  i`* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)16David Canzi
3 Jul 24  i `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)15Jim Pennino
4 Jul 24  i  +* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)12bertietaylor
4 Jul 24  i  i+* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)10bertietaylor
4 Jul 24  i  ii`* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)9Jim Pennino
4 Jul 24  i  ii `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)8bertietaylor
4 Jul 24  i  ii  `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)7Jim Pennino
5 Jul 24  i  ii   `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)6bertietaylor
5 Jul 24  i  ii    `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)5Jim Pennino
6 Jul 24  i  ii     `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)4bertietaylor
6 Jul 24  i  ii      `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)3Jim Pennino
10 Jul 24  i  ii       `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)2bertietaylor
10 Jul 24  i  ii        `- Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)1Jim Pennino
4 Jul 24  i  i`- Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)1Jim Pennino
12 Jul 24  i  `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)2Volney
12 Jul 24  i   `- Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)1bertietaylor
3 Jul 24  `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)42Jim Pennino
4 Jul 24   `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)41bertietaylor
4 Jul 24    +- Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)1Jim Pennino
9 Jul 24    `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)39David Canzi
9 Jul 24     `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)38Jim Pennino
9 Jul 24      `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)37David Canzi
9 Jul 24       `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)36Jim Pennino
10 Jul 24        +* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)4bertietaylor
10 Jul 24        i`* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)3Jim Pennino
10 Jul 24        i `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)2bertietaylor
10 Jul 24        i  `- Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)1Jim Pennino
10 Jul 24        `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)31David Canzi
10 Jul 24         +- Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)1Jim Pennino
10 Jul 24         `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)29bertietaylor
11 Jul 24          +* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)11Jim Pennino
11 Jul 24          i`* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)10bertietaylor
11 Jul 24          i `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)9Jim Pennino
12 Jul 24          i  `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)8bertietaylor
12 Jul 24          i   `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)7Jim Pennino
12 Jul 24          i    `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)6bertietaylor
12 Jul 24          i     `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)5Jim Pennino
12 Jul 24          i      `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)4bertietaylor
13 Jul 24          i       `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)3Jim Pennino
13 Jul 24          i        `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)2bertietaylor
13 Jul 24          i         `- Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)1Jim Pennino
12 Jul 24          `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)17David Canzi
12 Jul 24           `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)16bertietaylor
13 Jul 24            +* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)11Jim Pennino
13 Jul 24            i`* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)10bertietaylor
13 Jul 24            i `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)9Jim Pennino
14 Jul 24            i  `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)8bertietaylor
14 Jul 24            i   `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)7Jim Pennino
15 Jul 24            i    `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)6bertietaylor
15 Jul 24            i     `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)5Jim Pennino
15 Jul 24            i      `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)4bertietaylor
15 Jul 24            i       +- Newton's Laws of Motion as revised by Arindam1bertietaylor
15 Jul 24            i       `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)2Jim Pennino
16 Jul 24            i        `- Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)1bertietaylor
14 Jul 24            `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)4David Canzi
15 Jul 24             `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)3bertietaylor
15 Jul 24              `* Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)2David Canzi
16 Jul 24               `- Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)1bertietaylor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal