Re: do you believe we can quantize gravity?

Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 22:29:35 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
 

Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 20:40:09 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>

Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 12:39:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>

Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 20:00:12 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>

>
<snip old crap>
>

Having watched your videos I have to ask, what is it that you think is
new in YOUR railgun in one sentence? Where is your math that shows it is
anything new?

>
Heavy armature, very low voltage, very light weight.

>
Nothing new there whatsoever.

>
Keep on lying.

>

It is a new design
rail gun which proved Arindam's thesis that it has no reaction by easily
reproducible experiment. Which is the greatest science discovery of our
time.

>
Yet you have no details, no instrumentation, no data and no analysis
with error bars that prove anything.  Just crackpot ravings.

>
Keep on lying. What better to expect from racist bigots!

>
Does your railgun have two parallel conductors connected to a DC power
source?
>
Yes, nothing new there.

>
Did any other railgun design work in this manner?
Did any previous railgun design have manually portable low weight, low
voltage, and very heavy armature?
>
NO

>
Yes.

 
Who did that, lying wretch?

LOTS of people crackpot.

Do a google search for DIY railgun and enjoy the thousands of hits
crackpot.

>

This PARTICULAR railgun ***design*** IS A NEW INVENTION.

>
Nope.

 
Yes. No one did it before.

No one did WHAT before crackpot?

>
The mathmatics that describes how railguns work has been known for a
long time.
>
How is the mathmatics that describes how your railguns works any
different crackpot?

 
Penisnino that maths is beyond your scope.

You have no math, Arindam, never had, never will because you are just a
penis obsessed, arm waving crackpot.