Re: do you believe we can quantize gravity?

On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 3:42:13 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>
<snip old craP>
>

Fully agree so all decent scientists must carefully read and see the
physics works of Arindam. Then verify by repeating his rail gun

>
It seems that you haven't a clue what the word "railgun" means crackpot.
>
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Railgun
>
"A railgun or rail gun, sometimes referred to as a rail cannon, is a
linear motor device, typically designed as a weapon, that uses
electromagnetic force to launch high-velocity projectiles."
>
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rail%20gun
>
"an electromagnetic catapult designed to hurl projectiles at
extremely high speeds"
>
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/rail-gun
>
"a weapon consisting of a pair of parallel conductive rails, using a
magnetic field and electric current to launch projectiles at very
high velocity"
>
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/railgun
>
"a gun that uses electromagnetic force to propel a projectile at
very high speeds"
>
https://www.yourdictionary.com/rail-gun
>
"A weapon, consisting mainly of conducting metal rails, that uses
electromagnetic force to accelerate a projectile to a much greater
speed than that achieved by conventional chemical propellant weapons."
>
To be a railgun, the device has to launch a projectile.
>
All your videos clearly show that your device propels an armature down
a track at low speed where it falls off at the end. That is NOT a
railgun
and is nothing more than a linear motor.

It is most certainly a linear motor like a railgun but over 1000 times
more efficient with its new design. Trillions of dollars will turn it
into reactionless motors for interstellar travel. Lots of work to be
done once the physics behind it gets due publicity.