Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s physics |
On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 14:22:12 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 1:17:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:>
>Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:>On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 1:36:29 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:>
>In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:>Quite likely the penisnino is a Dark Age Inquisitor type Bible thumper.>
Always trying to replace science with sanctioned nonsense.
Delusional babble of a multiple personality crackpot and typical thereof
when confronted by facts that challenge the crackpot's delusions, e.g.
that efficiency is generally trivial to measure and that real railguns
have efficiencies of around 50%.
Wonder from which thin air that was pulled from.
How many references to that would you like as there are hundreds of
them, crackpot.
Do they all say 50%, Penisnino?
Not even the stupidest of physicists would be as ridiculous as you,
Penisnino.>>Arindam's new maths for rail gun efficiency shows the relation between>
efficiency with respect to current and gun design.
Efficiency is DEFINED as energy out divided by energy in, delusional
crackpot.
Which is always 50% according to you, Penisnino.
No, crackpot, what I actually said was that real railguns in the real
world currently have achieved an efficiency of about 50%.
No they don't, liar and fool.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.