Sujet : Re: Message to Bertie.
De : bertietaylor (at) *nospam* myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor)
Groupes : sci.physicsDate : 09. Nov 2024, 06:18:50
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <7fa940299adbb8c50d45bb900821b63c@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 4:41:30 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 1:01:44 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 20:57:53 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 16:00:42 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>
<snip old crap>
>
It upsets the whole of physics
>
It is drivel and not any any known format for a technical article
which means no one will read it in the first place, crackpot.
>
More despicable they in that case.
>
Nobody is going to read a technical paper that is not in one of the
standard formats for a technical paper, crackpot. Your reports are just
rambling nonsense, crackpot.
>
Arindam does not care
>
If you do not write your "report" in some standard format, nobody is
going to bother to read it, crackpot.
>
Who cares for IP thieves!
>
Non sequitur.
>
All you've shown is you don't know the meaning of the word "format",
crackpot.
Wrong, fool.
>
Arindam will patent first if he so cares.
>
Patents require a VERY specific format, crackpot.
Yes.
>
<snip remaining babble unread>
Message to Bertie.
Re: Message to Bertie.