Re: Message to Bertie.

Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 23:23:05 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
 

bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 14:44:16 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>

Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 3:31:31 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>

Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 0:45:29 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>

bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>

So Arindam's model new deWsign Railgun gives three times the momentum
than a rifle.

Which is stupendous.
First time one can see and measure the bullet moving up the barrel of a
gun.

>
Your device does not have a barrel, it has a track with a pipe slooowly
rolling down it, crackpot.

>
A gun barrel is a linear arrangement through which a projectile
accelerates. Usually cylindrical in shape, as is necessary to contain
the gases from a chemical explosion causing projectile acceleration.
>
The same cylindrical arrangement, out to ape-like propensity for
copying, is present in the existing railguns, making them highly
inefficient.
>
Arindam's new design has two rails which are the equivalent of a gun
barrel, and which accelerates a heavy bullet horizontally.

>
All real railguns have two rails, crackpot.

 
As does Arindam's, fool.

Well yes, but you talk about that fact like it is something new when
such was first demonstrated 107 years ago, crackpot.

>
The ones that have the rails enclosed in something that sort of looks
like a gun barrel are there only to maintain directional control of the
high speed projectile and have nothing to do rom with the accelration of
the
projectile, crackpot.

 
Usual nonsense from Penisnino.

Sorry, but such is trivially confirmed with a simple web search, penis
obsessed, delusional crackpot.

Though such is to be expected from someone that knows nothing whatsoever
about ballistics in any form, crackpot.

<snip usual idiocy>