Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper

On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 14:34:34 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 15:03:57 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>

bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

Woof-woof, Arindam allowed me to post the background info. about rail
guns in his 2013 seminal paper on the rail gun.
>
>
>
Arindam Banerjee and Dr. P J Radcliffe
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
Melbourne, Australia
>
>
>
>
Abstract—Recent experimental work on model rail guns shows very little
recoil upon the rails for the static case, where the armature or
projectile does not move.

>
Of course there is no recoil in this case because recoil requires
*MOTION*
as in Newton's laws of *MOTION*, crackpot.

>
Not so, ridiculous fool. Motion relates to velocity and momentum whereas
recoil is a force measured by mass and acceleration.

>
And acceleration is the first derivative of velocity, crackpot!

Wow penisnino you have heard about derivatives but have no clue about
what they mean.
Any bright 12 year old knows far better physics or other penisnono
Einsteinians ever will. For the 12 year old mind cannot be so
irreparably twisted.

>
You are utterly cluesless in everything you babble about, crackpot.
>
<snip remaining ignorant babble>