Re: ww3

On 1/19/2025 8:49 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:

In sci.physics Chris M. Thomasson <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> wrote:

On 1/16/2025 5:52 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 1/11/2025 8:32 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

>
On 1/11/2025 11:54 AM, Siri Cruise wrote:

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

I can be as easy as a highly dedicated person in a hole in the ground
waiting for tanks to pass by. It's been there for a couple of days....
All of a sudden a rumble... An enemy tank is near by. The person gets
a notification on his device... He pops out of the hole and targets
the tank with a wire guided anti tank missile and also holds a laser
pointer on the tank for anti tank surface to surface missiles to home
in on? Not to mention the anti tank mine fields galore.

>
Everybody but Russia knows you send infantry alongside tanks to deal
with enemy infantry with anti-tank weapons.
>

>
The damn tank can also be hit with drones and/or surface to surface
missile barrages. Each tank should have a couple of surface to air
missiles on it.

>
>
and who would supply
   drones and/or surface to surface missile barrages?

>
I think it just might be "beneficial" if a tank was also a mobile SAM
site wrt short/medium range anti air weapons. Although, I think tanks
are just big slow targets anyway...
>

>
I can see it now, a tank with anit-air weapons, akin to a tank/sam
hybrid. A group of state-of-the-art HARM missiles got interested... ;^)

 Armored vehicles that have anti-air and anti-tank weapons have been
around since WWI.
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-propelled_anti-aircraft_weapon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tank_destroyer
 

Indeed. Modern tanks also need strong anti-drone measures. directed EMP's?