Re: AI and fraud

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s physics 
Sujet : Re: AI and fraud
De : x (at) *nospam* x.org (x)
Groupes : sci.physics
Date : 07. Feb 2025, 00:50:14
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vo3hrm$361e5$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0
On 2/5/25 10:15, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 14:35:55 +0000, occam wrote:
>
On 05/02/2025 12:38, Richard Heathfield wrote:
On 05/02/2025 10:02, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 16:43:58 +0000, Bertietaylor wrote:
>
Those pushing AI have the implicit conviction that the vast bulk of
humanity are dull, lazy, apprehensive, conformist, cowardly fools. Apes,
in short.
>
Alas, they are so correct.
>
Woof woof woof woof woof woof
>
Bertietaylor
>
"If I were introduced to one
I would not say "What jolly fun!"."
>
Unpleasant, most apes.
>
And what a shining example you are!
>
>
Richard, you have been away a while. 'BertieTaylor' is the alias of
Arindam Banerjee, the well know nincompoop who believes gravity travels
faster than light, and that Einstein's e=mcc is wrong. You now know all
there is to know about BertieTaylor.
>
No, silly ape, while Arindam does say that e=mcc is howling nonsense
 You ARE Arindam, you babbling, multiple personality kook.
 <snip remaining insane nonsense>
Maybe some day time travelers from the future could copy the brain patterns from people at the point in space time when they die, and
upload those patterns into future computers.  Nonetheless since this
thread is on AI, they didn't get it quite right.  Now trying to send
interactions and responses back in time produces messages that are
closer to garbled.  These posts from the afterlife are just strange.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
2 Feb 25 * AI and fraud30Bertietaylor
2 Feb 25 +* Re: AI and fraud28Bertietaylor
4 Feb 25 i+* Re: AI and fraud8occam
4 Feb 25 ii+- Re: AI and fraud1Bertietaylor
5 Feb 25 ii`* Re: AI and fraud6lar3ryca
5 Feb 25 ii `* Re: AI and fraud5occam
6 Feb 25 ii  `* Re: AI and fraud4lar3ryca
6 Feb 25 ii   `* Re: AI and fraud3Peter Moylan
7 Feb 25 ii    `* Re: AI and fraud2occam
7 Feb 25 ii     `- Re: AI and fraud1Peter Moylan
4 Feb 25 i`* Re: AI and fraud19Bertietaylor
5 Feb 25 i `* Re: AI and fraud18Bertietaylor
5 Feb 25 i  `* Re: AI and fraud17Richard Heathfield
5 Feb 25 i   +* Re: AI and fraud15occam
5 Feb 25 i   i+* Re: AI and fraud12Bertietaylor
5 Feb 25 i   ii+* Re: AI and fraud10Jim Pennino
5 Feb 25 i   iii+* Re: AI and fraud2Physfitfreak
6 Feb 25 i   iiii`- Re: AI and fraud1Bertietaylor
6 Feb 25 i   iii+* Re: AI and fraud3Bertietaylor
6 Feb 25 i   iiii+- Re: AI and fraud1Jim Pennino
6 Feb 25 i   iiii`- Re: AI and fraud1Bertietaylor
7 Feb 25 i   iii`* Re: AI and fraud4x
7 Feb 25 i   iii `* Re: AI and fraud3Bertietaylor
7 Feb 25 i   iii  `* Re: AI and fraud2x
7 Feb 25 i   iii   `- Re: AI and fraud1Bertietaylor
6 Feb 25 i   ii`- Re: AI and fraud1Bertietaylor
5 Feb 25 i   i`* Re: AI and fraud2Richard Heathfield
5 Feb 25 i   i `- Re: AI and fraud1Bertietaylor
5 Feb 25 i   `- Re: AI and fraud1Bertietaylor
5 Feb 25 `- Re: AI and fraud1Bertietaylor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal