Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s physics 
Sujet : Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum
De : peter (at) *nospam* pmoylan.org (Peter Moylan)
Groupes : alt.usage.english sci.physics
Date : 11. Mar 2025, 01:29:28
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vqo05a$1kf0u$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; Warp 4.5; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0
On 11/03/25 06:54, jerryfriedman wrote:
On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 9:50:06 +0000, Peter Moylan wrote:
>
On 09/03/25 09:58, Phil wrote:
On 08/03/2025 22:46, Bertietaylor wrote:
>
It's just as implausible as the suggestion (easily
disproved) that the pressure is zero at the centre of the
earth.
>
The pressure is most certainly zero at the centre of the
stars and planets. Read a first year book on physics.
>
Which will say that within an enclosed surface with mass the
net gravitational force or pressure is zero.
>
Read that first year book yourself. Did you find the words "or
pressure"? No, I didn't think so. You've tried to conclude
something about the pressure from the gravitational force. That
doesn't work, because they are different quantities.
>
Gravitational force, like all forces, is a vector quantity. It has
a magnitude and a direction. That makes it possible that a number
of nonzero vectors can sum to zero; and, indeed, that is what
happens inside a spherical shell.
>
Pressure is a scalar. If you add two pressures, you get a higher
pressure. There's no such thing as a negative pressure to cancel
out the first pressure.
>
Think of a cone, or similar shape, whose point is at the centre of
the earth. You can separate out a section with thickness dr, and
write down the force balance equation for that slab. (This, too, is
first year physics.) From that you get a differential equation for
the pressure as a function of radius. No matter what
simplifications you make, you will get the same conclusion: the
deeper you go, the higher the pressure. Which is something that
ocean divers can confirm from their own experience.
>
Even swimming pool divers.
>
At the centre of the earth, the gravitational force is zero but
the pressure is at a maximum.
>
Presumably, by an analogous argument, the pressure at the centre
of a balloon is also zero?
>
Actually, the gravitational force at the centre of a balloon is
zero, if you count only the force due to the balloon itself. But of
course, you do have to count the attraction from the earth as
well.
>
Either way, what you conclude about the gravitational force says
nothing about the pressure. They're different quantities.
>
They're different, but they are connected.  Since the gravitational
force at the center of the Earth is 0, you can conclude that the
pressure /gradient/ there is 0.  Hint to Arindam.
Re-reading this thread, I have suddenly realised what has misled
Arindam. He keeps using "force" and "gravitational force" as if they
were interchangeable. Not all forces are gravitational forces; and to
calculate pressure you have to add up all the forces, not just the
gravitational component. At the centre of the earth, you also have to
taken into account the radially directed non-gravitational  force that
comes from the weight of all the rocks (and so on) above your head.
--
Peter Moylan       peter@pmoylan.org    http://www.pmoylan.org
Newcastle, NSW

Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Mar 25 * Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum116Bertietaylor
8 Mar 25 +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum87Ross Clark
8 Mar 25 i+* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum85Peter Moylan
8 Mar 25 ii`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum84Bertietaylor
8 Mar 25 ii `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum83Bertietaylor
8 Mar 25 ii  +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum74Phil
9 Mar 25 ii  i+* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum10bertietaylor
9 Mar 25 ii  ii`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum9Rich Ulrich
9 Mar 25 ii  ii +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum2Richard Heathfield
31 Mar 25 ii  ii i`- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
9 Mar 25 ii  ii `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum6J. J. Lodder
9 Mar 25 ii  ii  +- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Physfitfreak
10 Mar 25 ii  ii  +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum3jerryfriedman
10 Mar 25 ii  ii  i`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum2J. J. Lodder
10 Mar 25 ii  ii  i `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1jerryfriedman
31 Mar 25 ii  ii  `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
9 Mar 25 ii  i`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum63Peter Moylan
10 Mar 25 ii  i +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum42bertitaylor
10 Mar 25 ii  i i+* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum34jerryfriedman
10 Mar 25 ii  i ii+* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum31Bertitaylor
12 Mar 25 ii  i iii`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum30jerryfriedman
13 Mar 25 ii  i iii +- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
13 Mar 25 ii  i iii +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum4Peter Moylan
13 Mar 25 ii  i iii i+* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum2Tony Cooper
13 Mar 25 ii  i iii ii`- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
31 Mar 25 ii  i iii i`- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
13 Mar 25 ii  i iii `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum24Peter Moylan
13 Mar 25 ii  i iii  `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum23J. J. Lodder
26 Mar 25 ii  i iii   `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum22Bertitaylor
27 Mar 25 ii  i iii    `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum21Jim Pennino
27 Mar 25 ii  i iii     +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum9Bertitaylor
27 Mar 25 ii  i iii     i`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum8Jim Pennino
27 Mar 25 ii  i iii     i `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum7bertitaylor
27 Mar 25 ii  i iii     i  `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum6Jim Pennino
27 Mar 25 ii  i iii     i   `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum5Bertitaylor
28 Mar 25 ii  i iii     i    `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum4Jim Pennino
28 Mar 25 ii  i iii     i     `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum3Bertitaylor
28 Mar 25 ii  i iii     i      `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum2Jim Pennino
28 Mar 25 ii  i iii     i       `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
31 Mar 25 ii  i iii     `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum11Bertitaylor
31 Mar 25 ii  i iii      `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum10Jim Pennino
8 Apr 25 ii  i iii       `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum9Bertitaylor
8 Apr 25 ii  i iii        `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum8Jim Pennino
8 Apr 25 ii  i iii         +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum2Bertitaylor
8 Apr 25 ii  i iii         i`- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Jim Pennino
8 Apr 25 ii  i iii         `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum5x
9 Apr 25 ii  i iii          `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum4Bertitaylor
9 Apr 25 ii  i iii           `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum3Jim Pennino
9 Apr 25 ii  i iii            `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum2Bertitaylor
9 Apr 25 ii  i iii             `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Jim Pennino
10 Mar 25 ii  i ii`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum2Richard Heathfield
10 Mar 25 ii  i ii `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
12 Mar 25 ii  i i`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum7David Canzi
12 Mar 25 ii  i i +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum5Snidely
12 Mar 25 ii  i i i`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum4J. J. Lodder
13 Mar 25 ii  i i i `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum3Peter Moylan
13 Mar 25 ii  i i i  `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum2J. J. Lodder
13 Mar 25 ii  i i i   `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Phil
13 Mar 25 ii  i i `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
10 Mar 25 ii  i +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum4Rich Ulrich
10 Mar 25 ii  i i+* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum2J. J. Lodder
31 Mar 25 ii  i ii`- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
14 Mar 25 ii  i i`- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
10 Mar 25 ii  i `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum16jerryfriedman
11 Mar 25 ii  i  +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum13Peter Moylan
11 Mar 25 ii  i  i+* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum10Snidely
11 Mar 25 ii  i  ii`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum9Peter Moylan
11 Mar 25 ii  i  ii +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum3Richard Heathfield
11 Mar 25 ii  i  ii i`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum2Physfitfreak
11 Mar 25 ii  i  ii i `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
11 Mar 25 ii  i  ii +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum4Snidely
11 Mar 25 ii  i  ii i`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum3jerryfriedman
12 Mar 25 ii  i  ii i +- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Snidely
31 Mar 25 ii  i  ii i `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
31 Mar 25 ii  i  ii `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
11 Mar 25 ii  i  i`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum2Bertitaylor
12 Mar 25 ii  i  i `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
11 Mar 25 ii  i  `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum2Bertitaylor
11 Mar 25 ii  i   `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Physfitfreak
9 Mar 25 ii  `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum8Jim Pennino
9 Mar 25 ii   +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum5Jim Pennino
9 Mar 25 ii   i`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum4Jim Pennino
9 Mar 25 ii   i `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum3bertietaylor
9 Mar 25 ii   i  +- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Jim Pennino
10 Mar 25 ii   i  `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Physfitfreak
31 Mar 25 ii   `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum2Physfitfreak
7 Apr 25 ii    `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
8 Mar 25 i`- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertietaylor
8 Mar 25 +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum3Jim Pennino
27 Mar 25 i`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum2Bertitaylor
28 Mar 25 i `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Jim Pennino
10 Mar 25 `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum25David Canzi
10 Mar 25  +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum23bertitaylor
10 Mar 25  i`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum22David Canzi
11 Mar 25  i +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum20Bertitaylor
12 Mar 25  i i`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum19David Canzi
12 Mar 25  i i +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum14Bertitaylor
26 Mar 25  i i i`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum13David Canzi
26 Mar 25  i i i `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum12Bertitaylor
26 Mar 25  i i i  +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum8Johnny LaRue
26 Mar 25  i i i  i+* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum4Bertitaylor
27 Mar 25  i i i  i`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum3Peter Moylan
27 Mar 25  i i i  `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum3David Canzi
13 Mar 25  i i `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum4Peter Moylan
9 Apr 25  i `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
10 Apr 25  `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal