Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)

On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 19:58:25 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

In sci.physics Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote:

On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 13:43:38 -0500, Physfitfreak wrote:
>

>
Poor "Jim Pennino".. If he was alive
>

>
Is it true?  Is jimp no longer with us?
>
When I was a frequenter of sci.physics I had many a fruitful
discussion and also many an argument with jimp.  He was a very
knowledgeable and passionate practitioner of physics and of
science in general.
>
If true then I am very saddened by his passing.

Apparently reports of his demise have been exaggerated.

>
Thanks for that, but like most everything this poster boy for the
Dunning-Kruger effect posts, it is not true.
>
Likely he doesn't understand that his posts are such a waste of time
that I plonked him over a year ago and haven't seen a word he has posted
since then other than some snippets in his kook fight with the poster
boy for multiple personality disorder and barking mad crackpot
Arindam/Bertie.

You are not beneath the notice of us Arindam's celestial cyberdogs,
JimPee.
Woof woof-woof woof woof woof-woof
Bertietaylor