Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum

On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 8:08:51 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:

Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> wrote:
>

On 13/03/25 02:40, David Canzi wrote:
>

The relativism you hate didn't come from Einstein.  It was there all
along in Newton's physics.  Strange that you selectively hate
Einstein but not Newton.

>
That's an important point. If you read Arindam's claims, which I once
did on a day when I was bored, he has disproved Newton's laws of motion.
He doesn't say that himself, because he hasn't yet realised that a
failure of conservation of momentum would contradict what Newton said.
>
So Einstein gets the blame for accepting Newton's results.

>
Our genius gets his results from an incorrect application
of Newto's third law. (forgetting about some forces)
Since that makes the internal forces non-balancing
an isolated body can accellerate by itself.
Hence the perpetuum mobile, and the starship.
Einstein doesn't come into it, that's another fuck-up.

The Chinese are selling pm free energy generators. Arindam has violated
inertia with his electromagnetic rail gun this outing the basis of
Einstein's 1905 paper about the electrodynamics of moving bodies; e=mcc
depends upon electrical gimmicks NOT violating inertia. But that does
not hold with Arindam's physics which outs thermodynamics and relativity
and quantum as by-products.
Woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor

>
Jan
(enough said)