Re: Deuterium fissioning for the Sun's energy

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s physics 
Sujet : Re: Deuterium fissioning for the Sun's energy
De : xxxxxx (at) *nospam* yyyyyy.zzz (Johnny LaRue)
Groupes : sci.physics
Date : 27. Mar 2025, 04:48:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Thursday At 9 On SCTV
Message-ID : <xxxxxx-ED6212.23482026032025@news.supernews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.2 (PPC Mac OS X)
In article <71c43872c74ca31af3d5798370f936dc@www.novabbs.org>,
 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) wrote:

On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 22:08:58 +0000, Johnny LaRue wrote:

That video of the "no recoil" rail gun jumping backwards is priceless.
 
Liar, the centre of gravity of the whole thing moves forward violating
inertia.

No it does not.   Liar indeed. 

BTW, one does not "violate inertia".   One overcomes inertia.   With an
outside force.   You clearly do not even know what inertia is.  Noted.

Hey Berti.   Where is your video of a car moving forward by hurling
things at the dashboard?
 
see any rocket, fool.

So you don't understand how rockets work either.  Noted.  

You also did not answer the question.  

Hint:  Having no clue about physics is NOT "New Physics".
 
Chucking out old wrong physics is not enough, it has to be replaced by
new physics. Arindam did that in 1999.

You are the only source of wrong physics.   Someone writing a book that
is a comedy of errors is not "chucking out old wrong physics". 

<snip remaining insane babble>
 
Best a racist+bigoted fatheaded ape can do.

How does race enter into this?   I don't give a damn what race you are. 
You do not understand physics. 

BTW, playing the race card is the last gasp of a failed argument.  

BTW2, I don't even know what race you are.  Nor do you know what race I
am.   Which means that YOU are the racist here.

Woof woof

Still barking mad.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
25 Mar 25 * Deuterium fissioning for the Sun's energy21bertitaylor
25 Mar 25 `* Re: Deuterium fissioning for the Sun's energy20Jim Pennino
25 Mar 25  `* Re: Deuterium fissioning for the Sun's energy19Bertitaylor
26 Mar 25   `* Re: Deuterium fissioning for the Sun's energy18Jim Pennino
26 Mar 25    `* Re: Deuterium fissioning for the Sun's energy17Bertitaylor
26 Mar 25     `* Re: Deuterium fissioning for the Sun's energy16Jim Pennino
26 Mar 25      `* Re: Deuterium fissioning for the Sun's energy15Bertitaylor
26 Mar 25       `* Re: Deuterium fissioning for the Sun's energy14Jim Pennino
26 Mar 25        `* Re: Deuterium fissioning for the Sun's energy13Bertitaylor
26 Mar 25         +* Re: Deuterium fissioning for the Sun's energy7Jim Pennino
26 Mar 25         i`* Re: Deuterium fissioning for the Sun's energy6Johnny LaRue
27 Mar 25         i `* Re: Deuterium fissioning for the Sun's energy5bertitaylor
27 Mar 25         i  +* Re: Deuterium fissioning for the Sun's energy3Jim Pennino
27 Mar 25         i  i`* Re: Deuterium fissioning for the Sun's energy2Bertitaylor
28 Mar 25         i  i `- Re: Deuterium fissioning for the Sun's energy1Bertitaylor
27 Mar 25         i  `- Re: Deuterium fissioning for the Sun's energy1Johnny LaRue
26 Mar 25         `* Re: Deuterium fissioning for the Sun's energy5Bertitaylor
27 Mar 25          +- Re: Deuterium fissioning for the Sun's energy1Jim Pennino
27 Mar 25          `* Re: Deuterium fissioning for the Sun's energy3Bertitaylor
27 Mar 25           `* Re: Deuterium fissioning for the Sun's energy2Jim Pennino
27 Mar 25            `- Re: Deuterium fissioning for the Sun's energy1Bertitaylor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal