Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum

On 27/03/25 09:21, Johnny LaRue wrote:

In article <08dab68206a29d41e17b3a44b6161d7c@www.novabbs.org>,
bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) wrote:
>

On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 21:08:24 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
>

On 3/12/25 16:05, Bertitaylor wrote:

On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 15:40:27 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
>

On 3/11/25 16:19, Bertitaylor wrote:

They have corrupted not just physics. And humanity too with
moral relativism, setting up wrongs as rights and rights as
wrongs.

>
The relativism you hate didn't come from Einstein.�  It was
there all along in Newton's physics.�  Strange that you
selectively hate Einstein but not Newton.

>
Quote Newton on that. Did he say that light velocity did not vary
with that of what emitted it? That is the first postulate of
Einsteinian relativity and absolutely nonsense.

>
Except that it has been measured and confirmed.   Multiple times.
The light will blue-shift if the source is moving towards the
observer and will red-shift if it is moving away.   But the velocity
remains the same.

 
Arindam has been told repeatedly where his mistakes are. He's also been
told that a violation of conservation of momentum is a violation of
Newton's laws. All of his responses show that he doesn't want to listen
or to learn.
 

Woof woof woof-woof

>
Actual observations versus your barking mad opinions.   This is the
very difference between science and religion.

 
In case it's not clear: Bertie is the barking mad aspect of Arindam.